Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Procurement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee members approve contractors for 2026 street reconstruction and asphalt paving projects

Not specified in transcript · March 10, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Committee members moved and seconded motions to approve contractor lists for the 2026 street reconstruction Project B and the 2026 asphalt paving Project A; both motions passed by voice vote according to the transcript, which does not provide vote tallies or identify the governing body.

Committee members approved contractor lists for two 2026 public-works projects during a reconvened meeting, then adjourned.

A Committee member moved to approve contractors for the 2026 street reconstruction Project B, recommending A1 Excavating; Earth, Inc.; Francis Melvin; Hos Suns; James Peterson; Pember Companies; Steam Construction; and Switlickin Suns. "I would make the motion that we approve A1 excavating, excuse me, for the 2026 street reconstruction project B," the Committee member said.

Another Committee member seconded the motion. The Chair called for a voice vote; at least one member responded "I." The transcript records the motion as carried by voice vote but does not provide a numerical tally or identify who specifically voted.

On a separate motion, a Committee member moved to approve contractors for the 2026 asphalt paving Project A, recommending American Asphalt of Wisconsin; Hos Suns Incorporated; and RC Pavers. A Committee member seconded, the Chair called for a voice vote, and at least one member voted in favor. The transcript again records the motion as approved by voice vote without a documented tally.

After the approvals, a Committee member moved to adjourn, a second was made and a voice vote carried. The meeting closed with a staff or participant question about signature procedures: "What do we sign? What do we sign?"

The transcript does not identify the governing body conducting the meeting, the date of the meeting, or the numerical vote counts for any of the voice votes. It also does not provide contract amounts, award conditions, or next procedural steps beyond the procedural question about signatures.