Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Makakilo Drive topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Makakilo residents press for Drive extension and emergency egress; committee advances task‑force language
Summary
Community members testified that Makakilo relies on a single access point that could leave thousands isolated during an emergency; the committee adopted resolutions and a task‑force HD1 requiring co‑chairs, quarterly reporting, and a two‑year sunset to push planning forward.
Sheila Medeiros, a long‑time Makakilo resident and neighborhood board transportation committee member, told the committee Makakilo Drive extension work is about "public safety and emergency egress" and criticized limited community outreach during prior bills. She urged the committee to adopt measures that would mobilize planning and funding to complete the horseshoe connection down to the former North‑South Road.
"This situation is unacceptable for the thousands of families who live there," Medeiros said, noting that Makakilo currently depends on a single point of access and that an additional egress would reduce fire and evacuation risk.
Jeffrey Patterson, a resident who testified later, described a power outage that left stoplights dark and said a trip that normally takes 6–7 minutes took nearly an hour during the outage; he warned that a single accident or downed tree could choke the sole access route and significantly delay evacuations.
DOT representatives said the department stands on its written testimony and supports coordination with the city and county; DOT could not immediately answer questions about task force authority or whether historical environmental reviews (a 2009 EIS was discussed) would remain sufficient, and committed to follow up.
The committee adopted HCR 159/HR 149 (Makakilo Drive Extension) as is and HCR 70/HR 64 (establishing a task force) with HD1 amendments that create a co‑chair model between county convener and state invitees, require quarterly reports to local elected officials, and include a two‑year sunset for the task force unless a final report is produced sooner.
Next steps: The task force language sends a signal to the city and county to coordinate with state agencies; DOT said it would follow up on historical environmental documentation and report task‑force membership and workplan in future committee reports.
