Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sb 293 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate committee gives SB 293 favorable report after debate on 25‑foot rule and recording protections
Summary
The Senate considered SB 293, which would create the crime of interfering with first responders; debate centered on a 25‑foot buffer, whether the bill could criminalize bystanders who assist or record, and an amendment clarifying press protections. The committee voted to give the bill a favorable report.
A Senate session voted to give SB 293 a favorable report after lawmakers debated whether the bill — which creates an offense for interference with first responders — could be applied in ways that limit bystanders' ability to film or assist someone in distress.
Senator Weaver, presenting the bill, said it "creates the crime of interference with first responders" and framed the measure as guidance to secure scenes for emergency personnel. Weaver told colleagues the committee had a productive public hearing the previous day and that amendments had been discussed.
Senator Figures objected that the bill as written could imperil citizens who try to help someone being mistreated by law enforcement, asking for clearer definitions of what constitutes prohibited interference. Figures said she worried of scenarios in which people see someone with "their knee on somebody's neck, they can't breathe, they're screaming out, 'I can't breathe. I can't breathe'" and asked how the bill would protect people who step in or record those incidents.
Weaver and proponents responded that an amendment added for the state press association was intended to preserve news‑gathering and recording, so long as observers remained about 25 feet from the scene. Weaver described the bill’s intent as "more about securing the scene when the first responders arrive." The chair also cited Alabama law 13A‑3‑23, saying the current code "allows use of physical force to defend another person" in situations of imminent unlawful force, as legal context for how force and defense of others are treated under state law.
Senator Singleton raised practical concerns about enforcing a 25‑foot buffer—"who's get to measure what that 25 ft"—and whether the rule could be used to limit peaceful protest or to prevent family members from approaching someone in imminent danger. Other senators described local examples of people harassing officers at traffic stops and of bystanders interfering with volunteer firefighters, arguing the bill targets disruptive behavior that impedes responders.
Senator Bell, citing recurring local incidents of bystanders crowding officers during traffic stops, moved that the committee give SB 293 a favorable report. Ms. Ogden conducted a roll call; the transcript records multiple "Aye" votes and three "No" votes (Senators Figures, Singleton and Smitherman). Ms. Ogden announced, "Bill's given favorable report." The transcript does not provide a full roll‑call tally for every member in the excerpt; recorded responses show seven labeled "Aye" and three recorded "No." The motion's mover was Senator Bell; a second was not recorded in the provided transcript.
The committee discussion repeatedly framed the bill as an attempt to balance protection for first responders — police, firefighters and EMS — with civil‑liberties concerns about recording and protest. Lawmakers urged clearer, objective statutory language to reduce the risk the measure could be applied in ways that would chill lawful protest or bystander intervention.
The session closed with brief procedural remarks, thanks to Senate pages and adjournment.
