Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves intergovernmental animal-control agreement; trustees press for fee and term clarity
Summary
Trustees approved a regional intergovernmental agreement for county animal-control services (dogs) but raised questions about contract terms, the absence of routine cat services, and how fees are set (referenced to county code section 5-49a). Staff said fees are set by county ordinance and the agreement follows a Metro West template used by nearby municipalities.
Staff presented a resolution authorizing an intergovernmental agreement (IGA) with the county for animal-control services, describing it as a standard regional template negotiated through Metro West. The IGA covers dog services; trustees clarified that routine cat services are generally not handled by the county (except in cruelty cases) and confirmed the IGA follows the same approach other municipalities have adopted.
Trustees raised multiple contract details: the effective and termination-date language lists a two-year term but elsewhere reads like three years with a one-year renewal option, and the IGA does not list specific fees, instead referencing county code. Staff answered that fees are established by county ordinance (section 5-49a cited) and that municipalities are subject to those enacted fees; trustees asked staff to ensure local county names and template language are corrected before finalizing the document.
A motion to approve the resolution passed. Trustees who raised the questions said they understood the regional approach but asked staff to clean up template references, confirm multi-county service arrangements for conformity, and note where fee schedules are set.
