Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Immigration Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Pasadena council adopts staff-led limits on federal immigration activity on city property, pushes zoning review and outreach
Summary
The City Council asked staff to finalize an administrative policy limiting use of city‑owned property for immigration enforcement, ordered revamped public resources and contractor disclosures, and referred zoning and transit protections for further review. The motion passed 5–0 on April 6.
The Pasadena City Council on April 6 voted 5–0 to direct staff to finalize a package of policies designed to limit the use of city property for federal civil immigration enforcement and to improve public information and contractor transparency.
Deputy City Manager Alex Sto told the council staff has developed an administrative policy intended “to limit the use of city‑owned or controlled property … from being used as staging areas, processing locations, or operations bases for civil immigration enforcement activities.” Sto said interior signage is already posted in city facilities, an exterior sign is expected to be posted by May 1, and the administrative policy will be completed the week of April 15. He also confirmed staff has launched a city web page of resources at cityofpasadena.net/immigrationresources.
Pasadena Police Chief Harris described how the department will respond when federal agents are reported on city property: “We will immediately have supervisors roll out to the scene, make sure we are … filming everything that happens out at the scene with our body cameras,” and officers will observe and document activity rather than engage unless they identify objectively illegal conduct. Harris said documentation would support later administrative or legal action without placing city officers at risk by confronting federal agents on the scene.
Assistant City Attorney Arnold Lee warned council members of legal limits and litigation risk, citing recent court rulings that struck similar local restrictions and noting the possibility of challenges on Supremacy Clause and intergovernmental‑immunity grounds.
The council’s motion — moved by Council Member Cole and seconded on the floor — asked staff to: (1) refer a zoning audit to the Housing, Homeless & Planning committee to identify and close any land‑use loopholes that could permit large federal detention uses; (2) revamp the city’s immigration resource web page in English and Spanish; (3) ask the Civilian Police Oversight Commission to review and collaborate on the police policy; (4) distribute “know your rights” materials at libraries, rec centers and other city channels; (5) explore whether transit properties can be covered; and (6) direct the city attorney to draft an ordinance implementing those policies where legally appropriate. The council voted in favor on a roll call recorded as: Cole — yes; Hampton — yes; Jones — yes; Lion — yes; Madison — absent; Msuda — yes; Rivas — yes; Mayor Gordo — yes.
Staff emphasized several practical constraints: the city does not recommend a blanket restriction on private property because of preemption concerns; staff does not recommend offering a certified observer training program at this time; and contractor disclosures about Department of Homeland Security relationships will be collected administratively via bid forms for one year to inform any future changes.
What happens next: staff will finalize the administrative policy and signage as directed, publish the improved public webpage, begin monthly reporting to the Public Safety Committee, and return draft ordinance language and the results of the zoning audit for council consideration and potential action.
The council’s action creates a formal record of the city’s approach to monitoring and documenting federal immigration enforcement activity while flagging legal limits and the possibility of future litigation.
