Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Development Rights topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council accepts appraisal, asks TRPA to make development-rights trading transparent
Summary
Council unanimously accepted a Johnson Valuation Group appraisal that raised fair-market values for development commodities and set 2025 price points at one-third of market value; members also directed staff to draft a policy with benchmarks for discounted sales and asked staff to request that TRPA make commodity trading (RUUs, TAUs, coverage) more transparent.
The South Lake Tahoe City Council on May 20 voted unanimously to accept a 2024 appraisal of the city’s development-commodity inventory and to set 2025 price points at one-third of the recommended fair-market values, while directing staff to return with a clearer pricing policy and asking for greater transparency from the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA).
Assistant Planner Katherine Moore presented the annual report and summarized increases in appraisal values recommended by Johnson Valuation Group, including higher valuations for commercial floor area, potential and full residential units of use, and tourist-accommodation units. The appraisal also recommended a new market category for stream-environment-zone (SEZ) restoration credits.
Ben Johnson, the appraiser on Zoom, told council the development-rights market is “thinly traded” and prices move with buyer expectations. Council members repeatedly noted oddities in the market: the price for a residential unit of use had more than doubled in two years in Johnson’s appraisal, and conversion rights between commodity types (for example converting a tourist-accommodation unit to a residential unit of use) appear to show significant spreads that exceed the administrative conversion fee.
Council debate focused on two linked concerns: whether the city should continue to price commodities at one-third of market value to spur economic development, and whether the marketplace for these commodities should be more transparent. Council member David Robbins described the current market as “dark,” saying private bilateral trades and undisclosed prices introduce artificial risk for developers and homebuilders who need to purchase rights to proceed.
A motion directing staff to prepare a formal letter to TRPA requesting a more transparent trading platform for development commodities passed with unanimous support. Council also asked staff to return with a revised pricing framework that would define qualifications for discounted rates (for example deed-restricted housing, multifamily rental projects, ADU/multifamily incentives) rather than continuing ad hoc or inconsistent disposals.
The adopted resolution formally accepts the appraisal and establishes city price points at one-third of the recommended fair-market values for 2025, with staff assigned to develop implementation options and qualifying benchmarks for discounted sales.
