Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
San Miguel County staff and county attorney outline complaint-driven code enforcement and practical limits
Summary
County staff and the county attorney described a complaint-driven code-enforcement system using the SmartGov portal, explained the graduated notice process and inspections tied to building permits, and warned that persistent noncompliance often requires court action and has resource limits.
San Miguel County staff and the county attorney briefed the Planning Commission on how the county handles land-use and building-code enforcement, emphasizing the county’s complaint-driven procedures and the limits of local enforcement capacity.
Staff described the typical workflow: a complaint is filed through the county's SmartGov portal (or by phone/email), staff uses records and GIS imagery to investigate, conducts drive-by observations from public right-of-way, and issues a first, second and final notice of violation (usually by certified mail). "We receive a complaint and we begin the process of like substantiating the complaint," Matt said, describing use of records, aerial imagery and the SmartGov workflow.
County Attorney Mora explained enforcement options when property owners do not respond: the county may need to pursue statutory enforcement remedies that can require court proceedings. "There's really nothing in our own codes and ordinances that is self-enforcing and that we can't issue penalties or force someone to stop doing something without going to court," she said, and added that court enforcement can be complicated and resource-intensive.
Commissioners raised examples where enforcement is challenging: logging operations spanning multiple parcels, recreational camping and waste/sewage issues, and properties where homeowner-association or third-party ownership of buffers complicates compliance. Staff recommended that the Planning Commission favor clear, objective conditions and code language when authorizing Special Use Permits or code amendments to simplify enforcement later.
Staff encouraged residents to submit complaints through SmartGov (which provides a case-tracking option if the filer creates an account) and noted that staff will not publicly advertise individual enforcement cases. The county said it will continue outreach, coordinate with fire districts for review of technical items (driveways, access), and consider whether additional staff or contracted services (for example, forester services for ground-truthing) are needed for implementation of new code responsibilities.
