Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Group Daycare Deerfield topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Home child‑care operator seeks group‑daycare reclassification; Planning Commission continues case after neighbors raise safety concerns
Summary
A Hoover home child‑care operator asked the Planning Commission to reclassify her family daycare to a group daycare (which can allow up to 12 children based on state measurements). Staff declined a positive recommendation, neighbors raised traffic and safety concerns, and the commission continued the item to May 4 so the applicant can gather neighbor support and consider limiting capacity.
Alicia Riser, owner of First Steps Early Child Care at 3595 Deerfield Drive, asked the Hoover Planning Commission for conditional‑use approval to reclassify her family daycare to a group daycare, a change that would raise the ordinance maximum from six to as many as 12 children depending on Department of Human Resources (DHR) measurements. Staff told the commission the application was eligible after a six‑month waiting period following an earlier council denial, but staff did not offer a positive recommendation and listed a set of conditions the commission might impose if it chose to approve the request.
The request prompted detailed questions about how capacity is measured and enforced. Riser said DHR measurements of her heated/cooled floor area indicate her house can accommodate eight children; she told commissioners she plans to remain at a smaller number and is seeking the conditional use primarily so her operation is compliant with local and state rules. “I’m trying to be compliant with what I’m doing,” she said, explaining that children from nearby homes sometimes wait and play in her yard while they wait for a bus and that an unannounced inspection could make those children count toward DHR ratios.
Why it matters: the city’s zoning ordinance treats any operation serving more than six children as a group daycare home, which triggers different staffing and spacing requirements and requires conditional‑use approval in low‑density residential districts. DHR determines allowable indoor and outdoor capacity by measuring usable indoor space and required outdoor play area. Commissioners and staff repeatedly returned to the disparity between the ordinance’s upper limit (up to 12 by square footage) and the applicant’s assertion that, as measured, her home can only support eight.
Commissioners also heard substantial neighborhood testimony. Several neighbors described traffic, parking and safety problems at the dead‑end street’s bus stop and urged caution: one long‑time resident said the hill and turning movements create a hazardous corner when cars are parked or drivers turn to avoid a blocked street. Other neighbors, including the property owner, said Riser has cared for neighborhood children responsibly for years and that drop‑offs are staggered. A neighbor suggested a possible compromise to prohibit on‑street parking on Deerfield Drive during certain times.
The commission discussed options that could reduce neighborhood impact, including narrowly worded conditions limiting the approved capacity (for example, a permit that allows eight children rather than the maximum the ordinance permits for that address) and requiring confirmation of DHR approvals and building upgrades before any increase in enrollment. Commissioners advised Riser to gather written neighbor support if she wished to press forward.
Outcome and next steps: Riser requested a continuance to collect neighbor letters and refine her request; the commission voted to continue the conditional‑use case to the May 4 meeting at 6:00 p.m. The chair noted no new mailed notices will be sent and encouraged the applicant to notify neighbors directly. The continuance was approved by voice vote; specific roll‑call tallies were not recorded in the transcript.
Clarifying details: staff said a group daycare requires an additional staff member when capacity exceeds six; DHR measurements determine the numerical capacity for a specific dwelling; board members noted the conditional‑use approval would be tied to the business, not automatically transferable to another address. The applicant told commissioners she currently cares for five children (licensed for six), that DHR had measured her space and determined she could support eight, and that she would not necessarily seek the full 12 the ordinance allows.
What’s next: the commission will take the case again on May 4; the applicant was urged to return with neighbor support letters and any updated documentation from DHR or building inspections.
