Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Administration topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners review administrative code updates; property‑disposal threshold and card limits flagged for follow‑up
Summary
Staff presented updates to the county administrative code — changing grant procedures, retention rules and a proposed higher threshold for public sale of surplus property — and proposed credit‑card policy edits; commissioners asked staff to verify statutory thresholds (RSA 28A cited) and to confirm how PC‑card limits are parsed before adopting changes.
County staff presented a package of administrative code changes intended to streamline grant procedures and to clarify record retention and property disposal processes. The update would allow department heads to apply for grants in coordination with the county administrator and bring awards forward at the next regular meeting to avoid delays. Staff also removed a reference to an assistant finance officer that no longer exists and adjusted retention language to follow specific grant obligations.
On property disposal, staff proposed reconsidering the county’s public‑sale threshold (listed in the current code as $300) and discussed whether raising it to $500 would be appropriate; commissioners asked whether the threshold is dictated by state statute. A member of the public later referenced RSA 28A and said the statute’s threshold had been increased to $3,000. Staff said they had already referenced the RSA in the draft code and agreed to confirm the correct statutory citation and threshold before adopting any county change.
Staff proposed edits to the credit‑card policy as well. They said the county account has an overall $50,000 limit but that, conventionally, individual PC cards are parsed with smaller per‑card limits (for example, the sheriff’s card traditionally has a $5,000 limit). Commissioners flagged potential internal control issues if cards were left without parsed limits and asked staff to verify how the program is configured and to return with any necessary internal control edits.
The board did not adopt the changes immediately; staff committed to verify statutory thresholds and internal card‑limit configuration and return with recommended language.
