Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Merced council declares District 2 seat vacant, opens expedited appointment process
Summary
After receiving Councilman Deanda’s resignation effective Oct. 31, the Merced City Council declared the District 2 seat vacant and directed staff to open an application process with a Nov. 21 deadline and a special meeting for interviews and possible appointment on Dec. 2. Council discussed, but did not choose, a special election option (estimated $50K–$60K).
The Merced City Council on Nov. 3 unanimously adopted a resolution declaring the District 2 council seat vacant after receiving Councilman Deanda’s resignation effective Oct. 31.
City Attorney Craig Cornwall said the resignation triggered a choice the council must make under city rules: appoint a replacement within 30 days or call a special election. “Councilman Deanda has submitted a resignation letter to the city. It was effective October 31st,” Cornwall told the council.
Councilors debated the two routes. Some members urged appointment to avoid leaving District 2 without representation during the city’s budget and town‑hall season and to avoid the cost of an off‑cycle city election. Others argued the democratic choice is best preserved by holding a special election, even if it will be expensive and may fall months before the regular November election.
Public commenters urged broad community engagement. Ashley Suarez, who identified herself as a community organizer, asked the council to hold public workshops and to consult residents before selecting a process. “Residents would like to uplift the need to engage the community prior to making any decisions,” Suarez told the council. Jesse Ornellis echoed that view and said young people he works with prefer a special election but understand timing constraints.
The council settled on an expedited appointment process. Staff will open an application portal immediately and advertise the vacancy; the application deadline will be Nov. 21 at 5:00 p.m. Verified applications will be posted to the agenda, and a special meeting for candidate interviews and a potential appointment is scheduled for Dec. 2 at 6:00 p.m. The council directed staff to make the application easy to access (fillable PDF and an online button on the city site) and to accept accommodations such as remote participation when necessary.
Council members asked staff to prepare options and cost estimates for a special election should the council decide not to appoint; staff provided a rough county estimate of $50,000–$60,000. The council adopted the vacancy resolution and approved the application/interview timetable.
What happens next: Applicants will complete a short application and describe relevant experience; the council expects to interview candidates in public on Dec. 2 and either appoint a replacement that evening or return to a subsequent meeting. If the council declines to appoint, state and local timelines will control the date for a special election.
The council’s action preserves the 30‑day timeline for filling the seat while creating a public, agendaized process for evaluating candidates.
