Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Right Of Way Vacation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission recommends 30-foot vacation of First Street right-of-way to city council with conditions
Summary
The Planning Commission voted to recommend the city council approve vacating 30 feet of an 80-foot right-of-way on North/South First Street, conditioned on relocating the water line at developer expense, reserving public utility easements, maintaining 20 feet from a pump station, designing a vehicular turnaround, and completing improvements within three years.
The St. Helens Planning Commission voted to recommend that the city council approve a 30-foot vacation of a portion of the North/South First Street right-of-way, with a package of staff-recommended conditions intended to preserve public utilities and safety.
Staff framed the request as a correction to 19th-century platting: the corridor is an underdeveloped 80-foot right-of-way in parts of downtown that, because of topography and an existing pump station, will never function as a full through street. Staff explained statutory consent requirements for vacations (100% consent from abutting owners and two-thirds consent within the affected area) and said the applicant had met the affected-area consent thresholds required to bring the request forward for a council recommendation.
City planning staff (Jacob) laid out three options for the commission to consider: deny the request, grant 30 feet as requested (which skews the remaining public corridor to the west), or grant 20 feet to keep the corridor more centered on the collector half of South First Street. Staff flagged engineering issues that must be resolved if the council approves a vacation: the city’s water main should not be placed in private property and needs relocation, a 20-foot clearance around an existing pump-house structure is desirable, a vehicular turnaround that accommodates emergency and refuse vehicles must be designed, and public-utility easements should be reserved where overhead power exists.
Andrew Neimi of Lower Columbia Engineering (the applicant consultant) told the commission the vacation is a "win-win for the public" because returning the parcel to private ownership will put property back on the tax rolls and the associated redevelopment would bring upgrades to utilities and the intersection. Neimi said the 30-foot figure was chosen deliberately after outreach to neighboring property owners and is intended to allow a future multifamily project to meet practical design needs (parking, circulation, trash enclosures) without creating a new through street.
Commissioners debated trade-offs: some favored the 30-foot grant with staff conditions, while others worried about fairness if an opposite-side vacation were requested in the future (the "hungry hippo" analogy in discussion), the lost public asset value, and the potential impact on an identified downtown historic-district overlook. Staff and the applicant said that project-specific improvements and safety concerns (turnaround, utilities) will be reviewed under separate land-use and engineering approvals if a future development proposal moves forward.
A motion that the commission recommend the council approve the 30-foot vacation as requested, conditioned on relocating the water line at developer expense, reserving public-utility easements, maintaining 20 feet from the pump station, providing an engineered vehicular turnaround and necessary street improvements, and completing required work within three years passed by a majority vote (one commissioner expressed a recorded 'no'). The recommendation now goes to the city council for final action.
