Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Community Recognition topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Yarmouth Commission on Disability names annual "Evelyn M. Beiel Impact Award," outlines nomination process
Summary
The commission voted to name an annual recognition the Evelyn M. Beiel Impact Award and discussed criteria emphasizing "above-and-beyond" community impact, public nominations via a website form, and presenting the award at a Select Board meeting. Members agreed on one award per year and tasked staff to draft nomination materials.
The Yarmouth Commission on Disability voted to establish an annual recognition called the "Evelyn M. Beiel Impact Award" to honor community members, businesses or organizations that make notable contributions to improving access and quality of life for people with disabilities.
"This award publicly recognizes and celebrates outstanding performance by an individual as well as a business organization or group that goes above and beyond to improve the quality of life of people with disabilities," the commission read when discussing the award's purpose. Members said the award should reflect actions that exceed routine responses and should remain selective to preserve its prestige.
Commissioners debated whether to give separate awards to individuals and businesses; after discussion members reached consensus on presenting a single award annually that could go to an individual, a business or an organization depending on the year's nominations. Glenn Martin and others pressed for criteria that emphasize sustained or particularly impactful efforts rather than a single minor action.
The commission agreed to accept public nominations (a webpage form and downloadable nomination packet were proposed) and to develop written criteria focused on "above-and-beyond" impact, examples of measurable outcomes, and how the nominee's action advanced accessibility in Yarmouth. Commission members suggested modeling the form on templates used by local chambers and civic organizations.
Logistics discussed included timing and presentation: members recommended presenting the award at a Select Board meeting to ensure broader public recognition; they also discussed scheduling, potential costs for a plaque, and who would evaluate nominations. Staff (including Sarah O'Reilly) will draft a nomination form, propose evaluation criteria, and return to the commission with a recommended process.
What happens next: Staff will prepare a nomination form and criteria for the commission's review; the commission will solicit nominations publicly and identify a presentation venue (the Select Board meeting was discussed as a preferred option).
