Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Payment Processing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee clarifies NSF-fee language to include returned electronic payments

Vermont House Transportation Committee · April 16, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee discussed an amendment to treat returned electronic fund transfers the same as returned checks for the statutory $28 insufficient-funds fee, and confirmed the DMV’s current practice of posting suspension notices to a 'my DMV' account while also sending mailed notices and giving payers 30 days from the mailed notice to cure.

During proceedings on S.326, the committee reviewed an amendment (section 7) that would expand the definition of insufficient funds to cover returned electronic fund transfers as well as returned checks.

Deputy Commissioner Matt Russo told lawmakers the change is intended to reflect modern payment methods and clarified there would be no additional penalty beyond the existing flat insufficient-funds fee (identified in testimony as $28). DMV staff explained that once a bank notifies the agency a payment did not clear, DMV sends a letter and gives the payer 30 days from the date of that mailed notice to pay the amount in full before suspension measures proceed; if a registrant has an online 'my DMV' account the notice may also post there.

Rep. Burke asked several timing and notification questions; DMV said the statute already includes suspension-notice timing in other sections and that the proposed text does not change fees but only recognizes electronic-return events. Committee members noted concerns about mailed notices reaching seasonal residents ('snowbirds'); DMV said it is moving toward online notifications and improved forwarding but still mails notices when appropriate.

No formal vote was taken on the section during the hearing; members moved on to other bill sections after clarifying the administrative procedure and notification timelines.