Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Police Technology topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ulster County committee hears Axon demo of body cameras and AI features; moves Axon contract to next month

Ulster County Legislature Law Enforcement and Public Safety Committee · April 7, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At an April 7 committee meeting, Axon demonstrated a unified evidence platform with AI‑driven report drafting, evidence autotagging and translation features; committee members raised privacy, bias and court‑admissibility questions and agreed to postpone related contract resolutions for further review.

Ulster County’s Law Enforcement and Public Safety Committee on April 7 heard a remote demonstration from Axon of a consolidated evidence‑management platform that pairs body‑worn and dash cameras with AI tools intended to speed reporting and improve evidence organization.

Phil Lenny, a sales engineer at Axon, said the platform offers evidence autotagging, a real‑time crime‑center ‘single pane’ for integrating camera and sensor feeds, a secure portal for public uploads of digital evidence, drone support and translation built into body cameras. “We really want to kind of enhance the officer and community safety,” Lenny said, describing goals of transparency, accountability and time savings for officers who otherwise spend hours generating reports.

The presentation prompted questions about data access, customization and the AI features that generate initial report drafts. Legislator Huitt asked whether federal authorities could access Ulster County’s evidence. Lenny replied that Ulster County controls access on evidence.com and that Axon “does not have access to that data” by default; other agencies must be granted access explicitly.

Legislator Nolan pressed on the company’s description of “bias reduction” through automation and on whether the package includes facial‑recognition tools. Lenny said Axon does not offer facial recognition “in any of our products currently” and characterized the company’s study as showing the AI did not introduce statistically significant bias compared with human‑written reports. He described the AI output as a forced “first draft” that officers must review and edit before submission.

Sheriff Figaro and committee members clarified how AI integrates with officer workflow: Axon’s system transcribes body‑worn audio and the AI drafts a report from that transcript, so observations not spoken on audio (for example, smells or things an officer saw but did not speak aloud) will not appear unless the officer adds them during the mandatory edit step. The sheriff and Axon emphasized supervisory controls and auditing.

Despite the demonstration, the committee postponed the Axon‑related resolution(s) to next month so members have time to review materials and so the sheriff may address outstanding questions in person. Chair Clinton said the extra month will allow committee members to “digest all of the information that they heard.”

The committee heard additional operational updates at the same meeting, including commissioner reports on 911 call volumes and fire investigations, and the district attorney’s remarks on the legal standard for admitting AI‑related evidence in New York courts.

Next steps: the committee will revisit the Axon contract and accompanying resolutions at its next monthly meeting; Axon agreed to share its presentation materials with county staff.