Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Program Mapping topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
LAUSD approves $1M‑plus consultant contract to map district programs, with board demanding robust community engagement
Summary
Trustees approved a competitive professional services contract to analyze where high‑quality programs exist and where gaps constrain access. The Ernst & Young/Parthenon study will map programs, engage communities starting January, and recommend strategic reallocations to improve equity and enrollment.
The Los Angeles Unified School District board on Nov. 18 approved a professional services contract to conduct a comprehensive program‑siting and pathway study intended to identify where high‑quality career and specialty programs (CTE, dual language, specialty pathways) exist and where students lack access.
Scope and purpose: District leaders described a three‑phase approach: (1) a current‑state inventory of programs and demand; (2) community engagement to validate local priorities and gaps; and (3) mapping student pathways from early education to graduation to identify where students get stuck and where programs should be expanded or better aligned.
Consultant and procurement: Staff said the consultant team (Ernst & Young/Parthenon) was selected via competitive process, noting a multi‑stage RFP that narrowed an initial pool to finalists. Trustees pressed why external consultants were needed, and staff explained the scale of fieldwork, specialized analytic capacity, and desire for objectivity.
Community engagement and governance: Trustees insisted the consultant meet early with board members and regional stakeholders; staff described planned public outreach starting in winter with community sessions after the current‑state analysis is complete. Trustees asked for detailed public materials and the RFP documents to be included in board materials for transparency.
Funding and timeline: District staff said the work is funded through a combination of a Broad Education Foundation grant and bond planning allocations that would not reduce funding for active capital projects. Staff stated the project plan targets a June delivery of final recommendations, with interim board briefings as important decisions arise.
Concerns and conditions: Board members asked for clarity on metrics, protections against recommendations that contradict community preferences, and an assurance that program consolidation recommendations would propose concrete alternatives and not simply eliminate local programs. Staff agreed to bring the final report and recommended next steps to the board before changes are implemented.
Next steps: The board approved the contract and requested robust documentation and timely public reporting; staff will return with updates as fieldwork and community engagement proceed.
