Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Contracts topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Olive Branch aldermen approve $3,510 change order for airport corporate hangar

Olive Branch Board of Aldermen · January 6, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Olive Branch Board of Aldermen on Jan. 6 approved a $3,510 change order to a contract for 'corporate hangar number one' at the municipal airport, increasing the contract by roughly $3,510 and adding a 28‑day calendar extension to complete work on an electrical mounting change.

The Olive Branch Board of Aldermen voted Jan. 6 to approve change order No. 1 on a contract with Timbos Construction Incorporated for the city’s corporate hangar project at the municipal airport, adding $3,510 to the contract and authorizing a 28‑day calendar extension.

The change order increases the contract amount from about $1,474,981.20 to about $1,478,491.20 to cover an electrical mounting revision: the mounting will be placed on ground-mounted asphalt rather than on a pole, the board was told. A staff member affirmed the explanation of the change, saying, “Yes sir. I think so.”

The mayor said the hangar project, funded largely through an earlier legislative award, is progressing and encouraged board members to view the site. “If you hadn't had a chance to go by the airport to see the hangar, I'd encourage you to,” the mayor said during discussion.

Mr. Gamage moved to approve the additive change order; Mr. Collins seconded. The motion carried on a voice vote.

The contract and its change order were handled as part of the meeting’s new business; no additional public hearings on this change order were recorded.

Action details: change order No. 1 to the contract with Timbos Construction Incorporated for “corporate hangar number one,” additive $3,510; time extension, 28 calendar days. Funding for the project was described as coming largely from a legislative award tied to the 1.5‑million‑dollar project.

Next steps: The board did not record further public debate on the project at the meeting and proceeded to other agenda items, including a motion to enter executive session.