Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Superintendent Selection topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board schedules May 12 interview with deputy superintendent for consideration as next superintendent
Summary
Washoe County trustees voted 5–2 to interview Deputy Superintendent Tiffany McMaster on May 12, 2026, after weeks of debate over whether to appoint internally, hold an internal posting, or launch a search; the vote follows heavy public comment urging an open process and discussion of succession planning and costs.
The Washoe County School District board voted to interview Deputy Superintendent Tiffany McMaster on May 12, 2026, as the board considers who will replace Superintendent Joe Erns after his announced July 7 retirement. The 5–2 vote directs staff to hold a formal interview of McMaster at a special public meeting; any appointment could follow the interview.
Why it matters: The superintendent choice will shape the district's direction during a period of major capital projects, budget pressures and stiffer state qualifications for candidates. Trustees debated competing priorities: continuity and momentum from promoting a deputy who knows the district versus transparency and community trust from a broader selection process.
HR presented three options: appoint an internal deputy as interim and later permanent superintendent; formally interview the deputy before deciding; or run a structured external or regional search through a firm. The Nevada Department of Education must also confirm candidate qualifications under 2025 law (SB460), a 10‑day review.
Deputy Superintendent Tiffany McMaster told the board she has worked in Washoe County for 25 years as a teacher and principal and most recently as deputy superintendent, overseeing academics and programs. "My guiding framework is collaborate, elevate, innovate," she said, summarizing her approach and stating she would prioritize continuity and student outcomes if selected.
Trustees were split. Supporters said promoting McMaster preserves institutional knowledge and keeps major initiatives moving. Dissenters said the appointment should be tested through a public, competitive process so staff and the community can vet candidates and preserve trust. After deliberation the board adopted option two (formal interview), amended to May 12 to allow trustees and the public more time to prepare.
Next steps: Staff will develop interview questions and a rubric for trustee evaluation, coordinate public notice and logistics, and submit required candidate documentation to the Nevada Department of Education. The board may appoint the superintendent after the May 12 interview or defer for further consideration.
The vote on the interview directive was 5 in favor and 2 opposed.
