Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Solar Energy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Developer presents four-field community solar plan; neighbors press for drain-tile protections

Village of Montgomery Board · April 14, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Sunode Energy and the Feld family told the Village of Montgomery board they plan four co-located 5-MW solar fields on roughly 95 acres and promised local benefits including a municipal subscription and decommissioning bonds; neighboring farmers and counsel pressed for stronger, documented protections for underground agricultural drain tiles and expedited repair procedures.

Sunode Energy and the Feld family presented a proposal to annex roughly 95 acres into the Village of Montgomery for four co-located 5-megawatt community solar fields and asked the village to adopt annexation, rezoning and special-use approvals that would allow the project to proceed.

The presentation on April 13 described the project as four separate utility-scale arrays totaling about 20 megawatts on 95 acres (79 acres to be fenced). Sunode's lead developer Derek Wagner said the arrays will interconnect to a nearby 34.5 kV KMED distribution line and estimated a typical residential customer who opts in could save about $100 a year from a roughly 10% discount. He told the board the village could sign up as a priority subscriber and save roughly $40,000 a year. The applicant also provided environmental and operations details, including a proposed pollinator seed mix, a maximum panel height of 11 feet, roughly 45-foot distribution poles (24 poles on-site), and a 35-year expected project life with a decommissioning bond to be recorded with the village.

Why it matters: the applicant framed the project as a community benefit that brings modest local tax revenue and a direct subscription-based bill discount for residents, while neighbors focused on agricultural impacts. Daniel J. Kramer, attorney for the owners and developer, described how the state's statutory framework constrains a municipality's ability to reject solar proposals that meet state criteria, and emphasized contractual protections the applicants agreed to as part of annexation.

Neighbors and counsel pressed for explicit, enforceable protections for drain tiles that farmers say are essential to local agriculture. Attorney Rick Sloum, representing adjacent landowners, said map and GPS information on tile lines and the four required Agricultural Mitigation Agreements (AMAs) should be provided and reviewed before approvals advance. "If tile gets damaged, it's big time very expensive," said farmer Ray Feldott, who described how tile damage can take years to show up. The applicants said they had filed four AMA agreements with the Illinois Department of Agriculture, retained Huddleston McBride to survey drain tiles and to prepare mitigation plans, and committed contractually to repair or replace tiles damaged by construction.

On planning and process: planning staff told the board the Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0 with conditions, including a requirement that the site plan meet Agriculture District setbacks (staff and village engineer approvals for final landscaping, elevations, stormwater and wetlands reports; fire district signoff; a decommissioning plan; annual native-planting reports; and a requirement that the operator be responsible for timely repair or replacement of damaged drain tile and related mitigation). The draft annexation agreement also includes a dedication of a 100-foot right-of-way for a future Gordon Road extension from additional property owned by the landowner.

Board response and next steps: after the presentation and public comment, the Village Board accepted the Planning & Zoning Commission's recommendation to move the annexation, rezoning and special-use ordinances forward as first readings and to continue the formal process. The items were presented as first readings and will require future board action for final approval; no final annexation vote was taken at the April 13 meeting.

Applicant and technical commitments: Sunode representatives said they will post decommissioning financial assurance (bond) sized by a third-party calculation, that AMA obligations require the operator to locate and GPS drain tiles, provide as-built drawings, and repair or replace damaged lines at the operator's cost. The applicant also agreed to revise landscaping and setback details where requested; they proposed a 50-foot setback along the south property line (less than the village's 100-foot standard adjacent to the Fox Valley Park District) and said they had a letter of support from the Park District for the plan as submitted.

What remains unresolved: adjacent owners asked for clearer documentation and earlier access to final engineering and GPS tile mapping beyond the fenced project area so they could confirm where tile lines cross adjoining property and how mitigation will preserve fall to nearby outlets. The applicant said detailed pile locations and final engineering will be prepared during the building-permit phase and that the mitigation plan will be finalized before construction. The AMAs and Huddleston McBride's drain-tile study are on file with the village and were provided to neighbors at the meeting.

Key numbers and facts: four 5-MW arrays (20 MW total); project footprint ~95 acres (79 acres fenced); 24 proposed interconnection poles (~45 ft tall) with underground wiring after the poles; maximum panel height 11 ft; first-year CO2 offset estimate ~38,000 metric tons (project lifetime estimate >1 million metric tons cited by the applicant); expected household savings for opt-in subscribers ~ $100/year; village lifetime tax receipts estimated by the applicant at about $158,000 and school-district receipts at roughly $2.6 million (applicant's figures).

Representative quotes: Daniel J. Kramer, attorney for the applicant: "We would like you to vote in the positive to annex it, to zone it A under the village ordinance and then grant the four special uses." Derek Wagner, Sunode: "Our objective is to make clean energy available and accessible to everyone." A local farmer, Ray Feldott: "If tile gets damaged, it's big time very expensive." Chris (project representative): "That would be $100 savings" (average annual residential savings cited for the area).

What to watch next: the annexation, rezoning and special-use ordinances are at first reading and will return to the board for final votes; neighbors and the applicant expect detailed engineering (pile locations, final site plans, and as-built GPS tile maps) and binding mitigation steps to be produced before building permits are issued.