Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety Pay topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Montgomery County commissioners spar over HRM public-safety pay plan as sheriff urges raises to retain deputies
Summary
A contracted HRM study recommended increases to bring county public-safety pay closer to market; Sheriff Derek Cunningham and supporters urged action to attract and retain deputies while other commissioners asked for more time to review county financials before approving raises.
Montgomery County commissioners spent much of the information session debating whether to adopt a public-safety pay plan produced by HRM, an outside human-resources consultant, after the firm reported the county's salaries are below market.
Sheriff Derek Cunningham told the commission the HRM recommendations are intended to "get folks to normal" and said the proposal would help the sheriff's office attract and retain deputies in a competitive market. He described retention and recruitment pressures and the operational need for vehicle-mounted mobile data terminals and other investments the office is pursuing.
Supporters of the study urged the commission to act quickly. One commissioner argued the county is about 8% below market and that the proposed increase represents a modest step toward equity for public-safety personnel who "show up day in and day out." Commissioners backing the plan said failing to adjust pay risks losing recruits to neighboring agencies and could increase long-term costs.
Other commissioners said they were not comfortable approving an across-the-board increase before a full review of the county's finances. One commissioner asked for time to meet with county finance staff and to receive additional budget detail, asserting the commission must be able to confirm the county can sustain any increase before voting. The chair asked county finance staff to meet with holdouts and said the plan and supporting materials would be circulated so commissioners could digest the study before a vote.
No formal vote on the pay plan occurred during this session. Commissioners agreed to schedule follow-up briefings and to place the pay-plan items on a future agenda after additional review.
