Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Child Nutrition topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Jordan district votes to raise school meal prices and align staffing to curb rising losses
Summary
Faced with declining federal/state reimbursements and projected operating losses, the Jordan School District board unanimously approved modest meal price increases and authorized staffing adjustments tied to district staffing patterns to slow drawdown of the nutrition fund.
Jordan School District officials told the board on April 14 that the child nutrition fund is facing multi‑million‑dollar projected losses and recommended modest, incremental price increases paired with staffing realignment.
"Our best case scenario as a loss is $3.1 million. Worst case scenario is $8.3 million and our current best guess is 6.4," Scott, child nutrition staff, told the board when summarizing projected year‑end shortfalls.
Nutrition staff proposed targeted increases: elementary breakfast and lunch up $0.25 each; secondary breakfast and lunch up $0.30 each; adult breakfast up $0.50; adult lunch up $0.90. Staff projected the gross revenue increase from those changes at about $1.1 million; after estimating a modest decline in participation the net projected improvement was roughly $716,000 under their assumptions.
Board members questioned participation sensitivity, the potential increase in uncollected accounts, and long‑term structural solutions such as pursuing higher state or federal reimbursement rates. Katie Cole, registered dietician, and Scott said the district’s unusually low free/reduced percentage (about 19.9%) means Jordan receives less per meal reimbursement than many neighboring districts that have higher free/reduced percentages.
After discussion Miss Wood moved that the district implement the recommended price increases and align staffing to the district's staffing patterns (including small planned reductions where schools are out of pattern). The motion was seconded and carried unanimously.
District staff said the price increases and staffing steps are intended to slow the fund‑balance decline while they continue to pursue other cost‑saving options, analyze the state liquor‑tax distribution (a material but variable revenue source for Utah districts) and advocate for higher reimbursement levels. Staff also committed to alert the board before making staffing decisions that would materially affect employees’ benefits.
What happens next: Staff will include the price changes in the budget hearing process (June) and continue monitoring reimbursements, participation, uncollectibles and fund balance; any further personnel decisions that materially change benefits will come back to the board before implementation.
