Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Affordable Housing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

RDA approves $250,000 revolving loan to help fund 85‑unit Fire Station Flats project

Green Bay Redevelopment Authority · April 16, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The RDA approved a $250,000 2% loan over 20 years to General Capital Acquisitions to help close a financing gap for the Fire Station Flats 85‑unit development; staff said the loan would be repaid from project cash flow and that the developer showed a $50,000 match and other deferred fees to fill remaining gaps.

The Redevelopment Authority approved a $250,000 construction loan to General Capital Acquisitions to support construction of the Fire Station Flats mixed‑use affordable housing project.

Rebecca, a city staff member overseeing the brownfields and revolving‑loan programs, told the RDA the 85‑unit project (about 11 units targeted at households at or below 30% of area median income, with the balance intended for households between 31% and 80% of AMI) has an estimated total cost of approximately $31,100,000 and a financing gap of roughly $1.4 million. The developer requested a $250,000 loan at 2% interest over 20 years with repayment tied to project cash flow; staff said the borrower would contribute at least $50,000 in equity and defer some developer fees to help close the gap.

Staff said the city’s pandemic‑era revolving loan program (funded with state/local fiscal recovery funds) was established to support larger affordable housing projects and that loan terms mirror those used for prior projects: low interest (2%), 20‑year term and repayment from available cash flow, with security via a subordinate mortgage. Board members asked about matching sources, the relationship to other brownfields funding (cleanup grants and prior EPA awards), and whether staff or the RDA would select the cleanup alternative; staff responded that the city would provide oversight and that consultants and the developer would prepare the material management plan and seek DNR approvals.

A motion to approve the $250,000 loan was made, seconded and carried by voice vote; one member said they opposed but the motion carried.