Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Insurance Market topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Insurance Commissioner and DHS Back Bill Letting Childcare and Behavioral‑Health Providers Form State‑Overseen Risk Pools
Summary
Senate Bill 614 would authorize state‑overseen pooled self‑insurance (captives/risk retention) for child care, foster care and behavioral‑health providers to address soaring liability premiums and carrier withdrawal; Insurance Department framed it as a long‑term market intervention, not an immediate fix.
Lawmakers considered Senate Bill 614, a proposal to allow child care, foster care and behavioral‑health providers to form state‑overseen pooled self‑insurance arrangements to address an acute liability‑insurance market squeeze. Representative Lily Walsh introduced the measure on behalf of the Senate sponsor and explained the bill is modeled on approaches used elsewhere to aggregate risk and stabilize premiums.
Insurance Commissioner DJ Benton Court told the committee the market has contracted and premiums for certain coverages — particularly claims tied to sexual‑abuse and historic litigation exposure — have become “extraordinarily high,” driving some carriers from the market. He framed the bill as “not a JUA,” meaning it is distinct from a joint underwriting authority, and described the proposal as a captive or risk‑sharing vehicle that would take time to build sufficient scale and reserves but could become a sustainable, state‑overseen pool for eligible nonprofit providers.
Department of Health and Human Services staff and many providers supported the bill as a way to preserve service capacity for high‑need children and other vulnerable populations. They emphasized the bill would create a regulatory structure, eligibility criteria and oversight expectations rather than an immediate subsidy, and that participating pools would need actuarial studies and capital planning before operation.
Opponents and skeptics pressed the committee on questions of governance, whether claims could “blow up” a small pool, and how to ensure sufficient reserves and risk‑mitigation practices among participating providers. Commissioner Benton Court acknowledged those risks and said oversight and minimum safeguards — including the ability to accept participation by neighboring states to gain scale — are built into the proposal.
The committee closed the public hearing with broad recognition that the bill addresses a long‑running market problem but will require follow‑up work on technical rules and supervision; the Insurance Department said it is prepared to help implement and to refine draft amendments.
