Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the School Construction topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board awards $7.57 million contract for Area Technology Center renovation; architects say bids came in under budget

Marion County Board of Education · April 16, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Marion County Board of Education voted to award the Area Technology Center Renovation and Addition contract (BG25-341) to Calhoun Construction for $7,567,125, approving alternates that include owner‑preferred mechanical controls, flooring choices, door hardware deduction and a north‑face canopy, after architects reported competitive bids.

The Marion County Board of Education voted to award the Marion County Area Technology Center Renovation and Addition contract (BG25-341) to Calhoun Construction for $7,567,125, including alternates 1 through 4.

Brian Harris, a project designer at Ross Tarrant Architects, summarized the bid opening and recommended acceptance of the base bid and alternates. “Everything kind of came in under budget,” Harris said, describing alternate one (owner‑preferred mechanical equipment controls), alternate two (solid vinyl tile in place of LVT), a deduct for owner‑preferred door hardware and alternate four, a new wall‑mounted canopy on the north face of the addition to provide additional coverage for students.

A board member moved to award the contract to Calhoun Construction for the stated amount with alternates 1–4; the motion was seconded and approved by voice vote. Harris and other presenters said the competitive results may give the district room to add agreed‑upon items and that staff will work with the contractor on phasing plans for construction.

The board separately considered special inspection services for the ATC renovation to provide soil and construction observation throughout the build; staff explained the inspections would be on site during key phases.

Board members asked questions and expressed enthusiasm about the project; no dissenting votes were recorded in the meeting’s voice‑vote exchanges. The board also moved on a related pay application and other facility items later in the agenda.