Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Master Plan Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee backs $20-per-year, five-year master-plan funding recommendation

Budget and Finance Committee (RCS SCW) · April 7, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee agreed to forward 'Option A' — a $20-per-year APF increase for five years — to the governing board as the preferred way to fund the community master plan; staff said the approach preserves flexibility to pivot to other funding options later.

The Budget & Finance Committee on April 7 recommended the governing board consider 'Option A' for funding a community master plan: a $20-per-year annual property fee (APF) increase for five years, paired with an APF/dues model the committee said would allow flexibility.

Presenter Mr. Swan summarized the modeling and said the committee favored Option A after evaluating alternatives. "We considered two different options basically and we went with option A which was the $20 a year for five years," he said.

Committee members asked whether the outside consultants who prepare the master-plan recommendations would also advise how to raise money for proposed projects. Cliff replied that consultants can advise on priorities and design, but not on local revenue-generation mechanics; staff identified several funding options available to the community, including a loan, special assessment, fundraising and phased APF/dues increases. Cliff told the committee the recommended option allows the association to start work now and pivot later if a different funding path (for example, a community vote for a special assessment) becomes preferable.

The committee asked staff to forward the recommendation and supporting modeling to the governing board for final direction; the governing board will decide whether to adopt the proposed fee schedule, pursue alternative funding or put measures to a community vote.