Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pasco Moves Overview topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Pasco Moves update adds policies for emerging mobility, active transportation and ultimate‑lane standards; commissioners push edits on bike‑lane language
Summary
Planning staff presented the Pasco Moves transportation chapter update—covering autonomous/connected vehicles, advanced air mobility (vertiports), a new active transportation plan, regional rapid transit coordination, and an 'ultimate lanes' table. Commissioners asked staff to remove 'exclusive' language from the bike‑lane definition and requested clearer implementation links to land‑development code and typical roadway sections.
Planning staff presented an overview of Pasco Moves—the transportation chapter of the Pasco 2050 comprehensive plan update—highlighting four themes: future‑ready transportation (integration of emerging technologies), a connected multimodal network, safety/complete streets, and clearer standards and implementation tools.
Hyatt Mazile, principal planner and project manager for the comprehensive plan update, said the draft chapter streamlines goals, adds one new objective and 14 new policies, and includes an updated roadway vision map and corridor preservation tables. "This chapter is required under chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes," Mazile said, and the update aims to align policy with recent stakeholder input and statutory requirements.
New policies raise several substantive topics: integration of emerging transportation technologies and piloting with FDOT and the FAA (including advanced air mobility and vertiports); identifying transit‑emphasis corridors to support express and bus‑rapid transit; and an active transportation plan to guide a connected bicycle and pedestrian network. Staff stressed that FAA controls flight paths for vertiports and that the county’s role is land‑use compatibility, screening, and noise/appearance standards.
Commission members zeroed in on several specific items. They pressed to remove the word "exclusive" from the draft definition of "bike lane," arguing that narrow on‑street lanes can function as emergency shoulders and that multi‑purpose lanes or multi‑use paths are preferable in many contexts. Staff indicated they would remove the word and consider clarifying how the comp‑plan will coordinate with board‑adopted typical roadway sections and the land‑development code.
The update also proposes a new policy (1.2.3) allowing administrative updates to the future transportation system maps under limited conditions (e.g., a change in number of lanes or construction of a new roadway) while reserving substantive functional‑classification changes for formal comp‑plan amendment. The package includes an "ultimate lanes" and right‑of‑way table intended to standardize corridor footprints and to preserve right of way during development review.
Next steps: staff will refine language per commission direction (including the bike‑lane definition), continue coordination with the MPO and FDOT on regional transit proposals, and bring clarified materials back to the LPA and public for additional comment before forwarding recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners.
