Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Staff Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
MEA presents survey showing rising staff-safety concerns; district, union debate BTAM application and intervention options
Summary
On April 15 the MEA reported that teachers'reports of feeling unsafe rose from 33% to 44% and argued that BTAM (behavioral threat assessment) protocols are inconsistently applied, prompting a long discussion of special-education legal limits, information-sharing, incident tracking and intervention-room or security options.
The Moscow School District bargaining session on April 15 moved from athletics to staff safety after the MEA presented survey results and asked for clearer, consistent application of the district's BTAM procedures.
The MEA representative summarized the union's findings: "Of the respondents who reported feeling unsafe, 76% reported the cause as student behavior," and "When surveyed, have you ever felt unsafe while performing your MSD job duties? 33% of teachers reported feeling unsafe in the 2025 survey. This year ... that jumped up to 44%."
District administrators acknowledged the reports and explained legal constraints tied to special-education law and manifest-determination requirements. An administrator described the process: principals can suspend students for short periods under Idaho code and the superintendent can extend suspensions, but when a suspended student has an IEP the IEP team must reconvene for a manifest determination before the district may proceed with certain disciplinary steps. The administrator said these federal protections can shift incidents away from disciplinary teams and back to IEP teams for evaluation and service adjustments.
The meeting then moved to options. Members proposed a mix of near-term and longer-term actions: clearer and consistent communication so affected staff understand why BTAM decisions were made; improved tracking of violent or aggressive incidents (administrative logs or PowerSchool entries rather than only ad-hoc Google Docs); designated intervention spaces or in-school alternative settings staffed by trained behavioral-intervention teachers; adding behavioral-intervention staff or security personnel; and stronger parent-engagement or community programs to prevent escalations.
Participants flagged practical constraints: administrators said BTAM triage must consider whether behavior is a manifestation of a disability, and emphasized that even an expelled student with an IEP may still be owed certain services. Several members urged that staff be told not just the outcome but the reasoning behind decisions so they do not feel "blindsided" by administrative action.
No formal action was taken; the bargaining group agreed to table detailed decisions and return to the staff-safety discussion at the April 29 meeting after collecting additional information and possible straw language.
