Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Conditional Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission recommends conditional permit for employee housing at 731 Oakley Point with nontransferable condition
Summary
The Northland County Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of a conditional‑use permit allowing a converted three‑bedroom house at 731 Oakley Point to operate as a two‑unit dwelling for Horn Harbor employees, adding a condition that the permit be revoked if ownership leaves the Hester family. Neighbors raised concerns about occupancy limits, parking, septic capacity and fire‑safety inspections.
The Planning Commission recommended approval of a conditional‑use permit on a converted single‑family property at 731 Oakley Point on a motion that added a nontransferability condition. The permit would allow the three‑bedroom dwelling, built with two kitchens and separate meters, to be used as a multi‑unit dwelling intended to house employees of Horn Harbor Restaurant.
The commission opened a public hearing after staff said the structure had originally been permitted as a single‑family, three‑bedroom house and later was found at final inspection to contain two separate dwelling units. Applicant Danny Hester told commissioners the house was completed, final‑inspected and intended strictly as employee housing: “I own Horn Harbor Restaurant … we purchased a piece of property to build housing for employees,” Hester said, adding the house has two kitchens, two meters and three bedrooms total.
Neighbors at the public hearing urged caution. Tom Geianasi, managing partner of Terara Investment Group LLC, asked how the county would enforce a six‑person occupancy cap and expressed skepticism about whether six designated parking spaces could be provided. “Who is going to enforce if they have more than six people there?” Geianasi asked. Nearby homeowner Lee Self said he opposed converting what he had understood to be single‑family lots into multi‑unit uses and asked the commission to deny the request.
Staff circulated five suggested conditions that would apply if the commission recommended approval: obtaining any required permits and licenses; construction conforming to the Uniform Statewide Building Code; downward‑directed, shielded lighting; at least six designated off‑street parking spaces; and return to the board for possible revocation on noncompliance. Commissioners debated and then added a sixth condition written during the meeting that would revoke the conditional‑use permit if ownership changes from the Hester family. A motion to recommend approval “as applied for and with the conditions set forth” carried; one commissioner voiced a recorded ‘nay’ during the final vote.
Commissioners and the board representative also flagged fire‑safety issues. A board representative noted Northland County has not adopted a local fire code enforcement regime and requested that the county arrange a review by the Fairfield volunteer fire chief to assess egress, fire‑rating and other safety concerns before the Board of Supervisors acts on the commission’s recommendation. Staff said final building inspection would be required and reaffirmed the condition that construction conform to the Uniform Statewide Building Code.
The commission’s recommendation will be forwarded to the Board of Supervisors for final action. The applicant, staff and the public were told the board will make the final decision and that the conditional nature of the permit means the county could revisit the matter on evidence of noncompliance.
