Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Solid Waste topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council hears Waste Pro's proposal for temporary fuel surcharge; decision deferred to May 7

Canton City Council · April 16, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Waste Pro has asked to add a temporary fuel surcharge to residential sanitation bills because of higher diesel costs. After negotiations the company trimmed its request from 15% to 10% (estimated at about $2 per month per customer); council asked for contract basis, triggers, and a sunset and deferred action to May 7 so the company can present details.

City staff told council that Waste Pro requested authority to add a fuel surcharge to residential sanitation invoices to cover higher diesel and landfill fuel‑related charges. The company initially proposed a 15% surcharge and, after discussion with staff, reduced the request to 10%.

"They decided to reduce that to 10%," the staff presenter said, noting state diesel excise-tax relief had recently lowered pump prices and that the vendor sought a pass-through for extraordinary fuel increases. City counsel advised the council that the contract allows for rate adjustments due to extraordinary fuel increases but requires vendor notification and council review; "approval shall not be unreasonably withheld," the attorney said.

Council members asked how long a surcharge would last, whether a formula (for example, a CPI or state-average fuel trigger) could govern adjustments, how the city would require reduction when fuel costs fall, and whether the company would present supporting financial data. Staff estimated a 10% surcharge would amount to roughly $2 per month per customer; council asked Waste Pro to return May 7 with a formal plan and supporting documentation.

No vote was taken April 16. Council members discussed possible conditions: a defined sunset or scheduled review date (suggestions included 90 days or an Oct. 1 review), a trigger tied to a fuel-price index, and explicit reduction mechanisms when costs decline.