Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Affordable Housing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Bernards Township committee endorses Housing Element and Fair Share Plan over resident objections; files plan with court docket

Bernards Township Committee · May 27, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee voted 4–1 to endorse the Planning Board's Housing Element and Fair Share Plan and authorize filing with the court docket SOM‑L‑157‑25, concluding a contentious discussion about site selection (Ridge Oak, Westgate, Mountain View), traffic and unmet needs for seniors and special‑needs housing.

After extended debate and public comment, the Bernards Township Committee voted 4–1 on May 27 to adopt Resolution 2025‑0233, authorizing the township attorney to file the Housing Element and Fair Share Plan (adopted by the planning board May 20, 2025) with the court docket SOM‑L‑157‑25 and the court's Affordable Housing Dispute Resolution program.

The resolution implements the planning board's recommendation to satisfy the township's fourth‑round affordable‑housing obligation through a set of sites that includes Ridge Oak and Westgate. Township officials and planners said the chosen sites reduce the number of market‑rate units that would otherwise be required and that utilities and state planning designations support redevelopment.

Township attorney John Bolardo and planner Kendra Ley were repeatedly thanked during the discussion for their work; Bolardo was credited for guiding the township through the process. Planner Kendra Ley's presentation (reported by committee members) addressed development feasibility, sewer and water capacity, and the planning rationale.

Opposition from residents and concerns raised at the meeting included traffic impacts, the scale of new residents, and unmet local needs for senior and special‑needs housing. A resident who spoke during public comment asked that public comment be taken when the budget is introduced rather than a month later; Nancy Dandrea, a resident, recounted family experiences and praised the town's cultural diversity while noting civic confusion over planning procedures.

Multiple committee members framed the action as compliance with state constitutional obligations for affordable housing. One committee member said the selected plan "results in less overall development" compared with other options and emphasized outreach commitments: when detailed engineering and site plans are ready, developers will be asked to meet neighboring residents at the community center to discuss specifics.

Vote and motions: the resolution was moved and seconded and passed on roll call (Miss Acy voted no; Miss Dwarte McCarthy, Mr. McN, Mr. Tani and Mayor Fields voted yes). Committee minutes record the vote as 4 yes, 1 no.

Other actions at the meeting: the committee adopted Ordinance 2579 (a capital appropriation of $6,190,591.79) by unanimous roll call and introduced Ordinance 2580 (alarm‑system licensing) for a June 24 public hearing.

Why it matters: endorsing and filing the Housing Element is a procedural but consequential step toward satisfying the township's state‑mandated affordable housing obligation; it sets the sites that will be reviewed in subsequent site‑plan hearings and frames future developer–resident engagement.

Next steps: the plan will be filed with the designated court docket and developers will move toward site‑plan engineering and local planning‑board review; committee members said the township will invite neighboring residents to project‑specific meetings when plans are more developed.