Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Plastics Waivers topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board grants waivers to Jack and the Beantock over costly plastic alternatives
Summary
Falmouth approved four waiver requests for a local food business (Jack and the Beantock) after the owner presented evidence that accepted non‑plastic alternatives more than double current container costs; the board encouraged continued substitution efforts and data collection for assessing supply‑chain impacts.
The Board of Health voted to approve four waiver requests from a local food establishment seeking relief from parts of the town’s plastics regulation.
A representative identified in the meeting materials as A Cupel outlined four items for which the business could not yet secure affordable alternatives: cookie/takeout salad containers, certain plastic‑topped platters, deli/film bags and a six‑pack donut carrier. The representative presented per‑case price comparisons showing replacements at two‑to‑ten times current costs for some sizes and described supply‑chain limits for heavier duty or grease‑resistant non‑plastic options. Business owners (including Amy) also described customer reuse behavior for thicker bags and said paper or heavier plastic are sometimes used as viable options but at higher cost.
Board members questioned how costs should be measured — per‑unit cost versus fraction of the retail item price — and whether a consistent method to report per‑product economic impact could be included in the waiver application. The board and staff discussed differences between waivers and formal variances and options for tracking aggregate data across multiple vendors.
After discussion the board approved the four waiver requests for Jack and the Beantock; one member recorded an abstention. The board encouraged continued efforts to find alternatives, recommended that staff compile summary data from multiple waivers to identify systemic problems (particularly for markets/grocery chains with many product SKUs), and suggested refining the waiver form to request per‑unit cost and the retail context that would help board review.
