Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Values Statement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lake County GPAC reviews draft values statement; chair urges adding 'regeneration' and clearer purpose
Summary
At an April 17 GPAC meeting, PlaceWorks and county staff presented a draft values statement for Lake County; Chair Denise Rushing and committee members urged restoring a purpose‑style statement that emphasizes ecological regeneration and measurable accountability.
Get email alerts on the Values Statement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lake County’s General Plan Advisory Committee on April 17 reviewed a newly drafted ‘‘values, assets and treasured qualities’’ statement intended for inclusion in the county’s General Plan 2050. PlaceWorks consultant Andrea read the draft and invited committee feedback before a longer presentation on the Health and Safety element.
"The one key concept that's missing from this statement is the idea of regeneration," Chair Denise Rushing said, urging the committee to restore language that positions ecological health as the foundation for the county’s economy and community vitality. Rushing said her earlier 2024 purpose‑style wording emphasized ‘‘preserve and in many cases restore healthy watersheds’’ and recommended the committee reintroduce that framing.
The draft statement presented by Andrea highlights a range of community priorities drawn from surveys and workshops: the county’s small‑town character, agricultural identity, scenic landscapes, recreational access, tribal influences, historic preservation, and potential for small business and tourism. Andrea said staff integrated GPAC input and community outreach to assemble the draft.
Several GPAC members and members of the public suggested edits and clarifications rather than wholesale rewrites. GPAC member Betsy Khan noted editorial fixes — "the word complimented is misspelled," she said — and urged that historic resource language should reflect both positive and difficult local histories. Public commenter Julia Carrera asked that the draft call out ‘‘positive community and economic growth’’ more explicitly to sharpen the plan’s economic focus.
Committee members debated whether the document should contain separate vision and values sections. Some recommended keeping a concise purpose statement up front while allowing aspirational goals to follow. Andrea said staff can perform wording edits and circulate revised language.
The committee also confirmed that an official land acknowledgement will appear both in the general plan overview and in each local area plan, with staff coordinating tribal spellings and place names with tribal historic preservation officers.
Next steps: staff will incorporate GPAC edits, run additional word‑smithing and spelling corrections, and circulate an updated draft for the final public comment period; the broader General Plan schedule includes local area advisory meetings through late April and planning commission and Board of Supervisors hearings later in the summer and fall.
The committee’s review was procedural and no formal vote was taken on the values statement.

