Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Accessory Structures topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission opens discussion on shipping containers and tables accessory‑structure policy for further work
Summary
Commissioners opened a public hearing on allowing shipping containers as accessory structures in some districts, discussed colors, screening and acreage‑based limits, and tabled the item for staff to return with ordinance language treating containers like other accessory buildings and clarifying event‑center exceptions.
Commissioners opened a public hearing Jan. 8 on proposed changes to shipping‑container rules and tabled the item for additional study.
Staff noted that the city’s code currently allows temporary containers with a 9‑month building permit limit (exceptions exist for construction trailers and modular school buildings), but that containers have become more visible on Dayton properties — for storage, event uses (concessions and seasonal attractions) and industrial yards. Staff proposed allowing containers on larger parcels in agricultural (A1, A2, A3) and industrial districts with limits on quantity; commissioners debated whether to treat containers as accessory buildings, to require color/finish and screening standards, and whether event centers should be treated as a separate category.
Public comment included concerns about containers clustered on smaller residential properties and about aesthetic and nuisance issues. Commissioners directed staff to return with draft language that generally treats shipping containers as accessory structures (with setbacks and appearance standards similar to other accessory buildings), ties allowable counts or total accessory area to parcel size, and provides clear exceptions for bona fide event centers. The public hearing was continued and the commission tabled the item to give staff time to craft a detailed ordinance amendment.
