Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Carroll Consolidated board reviews proposed rule for homeschool students to join athletics
Summary
The Carroll Consolidated School Corp. board discussed a draft policy to allow non‑traditional (home‑schooled and non‑public) students to participate in athletics and extracurriculars under a single‑course enrollment model, raised questions about state testing requirements and whether the change would weaken academic standards.
A presenter for the Carroll Consolidated School Corp. introduced a draft policy on April 14 proposing that non‑traditional students be eligible for IHSAA‑recognized athletics and extracurricular activities by enrolling in a single course rather than attending school for a half day and taking specified English and math classes.
The presenter said the draft borrows from a Rossville model and noted the board can keep its original NEOLA‑based language, adopt the proposed change, or modify the draft during the next two months ahead of a first reading at a regular board meeting. "Students who participate in curricular program at Carroll Consolidated School Corp. will be counted as enrolled students in the ADM. Students enrolled in courses that require state and or local testing shall be required to participate in the testing program as a condition of enrollment," the presenter read from the proposal.
Board members asked whether statewide and end‑of‑course assessments would apply to students enrolled in single courses. The presenter pointed to proposed language (section 5 / referenced text) that requires participation in state assessments for any course that triggers testing. A board member who identified themself as superintendent framed the core policy tradeoff: loosening attendance/course requirements could increase participation but the board must decide if it would "water down" academic expectations.
The presenter said the policy change was prompted by a parent request and by the increasing prevalence of virtual and non‑traditional enrollments in neighboring districts. The board agreed to study the draft, compare it to other districts' policies and IHSA rules, and revisit the matter at upcoming meetings before any formal vote.
The work session included clarification that the draft's section numbering will be corrected and that administrators will ensure proposed language explicitly states testing obligations for enrolled courses. No motion or vote was taken at the work session; the board scheduled further consideration and a first reading at a future regular meeting.
