Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Vendor Management topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

La Crosse County Human Services sets invoice deadline, tightens CCS/CLTS supervision and vendor-quality standards

La Crosse County Human Services · November 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

La Crosse County told CCS and CLTS providers that 2026 contracts are being issued and asked vendors to submit all 2025 invoices by Jan. 9 to meet a state Medical Assistance year‑end. County supervisors detailed new expectations for clinical supervision, training documentation, grievance handling, a 2026 vendor report card and a notice‑of‑finding/plan‑of‑correction process.

Paul Minger, contract unit supervisor for La Crosse County Human Services, opened the vendor meeting by telling providers the county is rolling out 2026 contracts and asking that all 2025 invoices be submitted early so fiscal staff can meet state year‑end processing.

"The 2025 invoice date will be January 9th," Minger said, and county staff added that the state’s Medical Assistance deadline requires counties to have materials processed by Jan. 31.

Why it matters: the invoice deadline and the timing of contract issuance affect when providers can bill and be paid for services delivered in 2025. Vendors that miss the Jan. 9 request risk delayed payment because county and state fiscal deadlines are fixed.

County supervisors then reviewed program changes that will affect service authorization, documentation and vendor oversight. Shelley Toliffson, a CLTS supervisor, said DHS has signaled a review of certain CLTS service categories — notably empowerment/self‑determination and family and unpaid caregiver training — and asked vendors to document how those supports are delivered so the county can align authorizations with forthcoming state guidance.

For CCS providers, supervisors outlined training and supervision expectations the state is enforcing more strictly. Heather Lind and Ryan Ross said continuing‑education records and clinical‑supervision logs are under closer review by DHS and audit bodies.

"One hour of clinical supervision for every 30 hours of direct service" is the standard the county expects supervisors to be able to demonstrate for unlicensed staff, Ross said. Supervisors stressed that supervision must be documented in signed logs and that routine team meetings generally do not count unless the clinical supervisor provides explicit guidance and staff performance evaluation during the meeting.

County staff warned that state auditors and the Office of the Inspector General are increasingly scrutinizing not just whether staff completed trainings but whether they can apply that training in practice. Vendors should attach training agendas, slide decks and certificates to training logs to substantiate content and attendance.

Ellen Dobert, a CCS supervisor, described a new informal grievance and escalation process for client complaints: vendors should handle consumer complaints as the county would its own staff and document informal resolutions. Informal grievance outcomes should be routed to the county CCS mailbox; unresolved matters will be elevated to the county and then to the state if necessary.

To monitor vendor performance more systematically, the county will introduce a yearly vendor report card in 2026 and a formal notice‑of‑finding / plan‑of‑correction process. The county said providers will receive a notice within 15 calendar days of a finding, must submit a plan of correction within 30 calendar days, and should complete corrective actions within 60 calendar days (sometimes faster for serious issues). The county said repeated or severe failures could lead to contract termination.

County staff also addressed technical matters and provider needs: continuing education hours for CCS must be submitted by Dec. 31; continuing‑education shortfalls cannot be backfilled and staff short of required hours may need to discontinue services until recredentialed. Supervisors encouraged vendors to share tools to track supervision hours; one vendor offered a spreadsheet the county asked be routed through the CCS mailbox for possible wider use.

Other items covered: the county cautioned against using free AI note‑taking bots in government meetings and advised vendors to ensure any AI tools used for client documentation meet HIPAA/confidentiality protections. Staff invited agency and client membership in the CCS coordination committee (membership must balance county, agency and client representation) and listed specialty service needs — such as gender‑identity exploration support, grief counseling, male wellness/skills providers and evening availability for youth services.

The meeting concluded with county staff confirming 2026 vendor meeting dates (March 3, July 7 and Nov. 17 at 10 a.m.) and noting the meeting recording and notes will be posted to the county website.

What’s next: vendors should submit 2025 invoices by Jan. 9, return requested market‑rate information to county contacts, ensure training and supervision documentation is complete and routed to county mailboxes, and watch for the county’s vendor report‑card materials and any contract updates in early 2026.