Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Graduation Requirements topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cloverdale trustees debate how to add state‑mandated ethnic‑studies credits amid budget concerns
Summary
Board discussion focused on adding 10 credits for ethnic studies to meet a state requirement and on clarifying elective/CTE credit distribution; trustees raised concerns about schedule capacity, budget-driven cuts to the eight‑period day, and whether the district should reallocate existing credits rather than add to the total.
The Cloverdale Unified Board of Trustees engaged in an extended discussion about proposed revisions to high‑school graduation requirements that would add 10 credits for ethnic studies to satisfy a state mandate and clarify that 20 of the elective credits be career‑technical education (CTE) related. The staff presentation said the changes would raise the district total from 238 to 248 credits, with ethnic studies required for the graduating class of 2029 (incoming freshmen for that cohort).
District staff described options for implementing the mandate, including making ethnic studies a year‑long course integrated into existing social‑studies sequences or reallocating an existing elective year so the total credits do not increase. Staff noted that California’s minimum graduation requirement is 130 credits, and that the district’s locally set total can exceed that minimum. Kevin Mamon, the district social‑studies teacher referenced in the discussion, and other staff explained how ethnic‑studies content could be integrated into current freshman curricula.
Trustees expressed concern that looming budget cuts could force the district to reduce the current eight‑period day, which in turn would limit students’ ability to earn the additional credits without taking away elective or CTE opportunities. One trustee urged caution about increasing the total credits while the district evaluates staffing and schedule changes; several trustees suggested alternative approaches, such as requiring ethnic studies within existing social‑studies coursework rather than adding credits.
Board members also asked staff to research how exemptions required by state law (for foster youth, homeless students, incarcerated youth and others) should be reflected in board policy or administrative regulations. Legal counsel’s recommended language was included in the packet, and staff said they would follow up with comparative policies from other districts.
Action: The board moved to table final action on the broader policy revision (S3) to allow further study of schedule and budget implications and to return with revised options. The board separately approved an administrative regulation (S4) on differential graduation and competency standards for students with disabilities.
What’s next: Staff will analyze scheduling options and the fiscal implications of any required staffing to sustain an eight‑period day or alternative approaches, and return with a recommended plan that ensures students will have a feasible path to meet any revised graduation requirements.
