Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Signage topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission debates sign‑code revisions; variance tabled to May 7 for further staff work

Planning & Zoning Commission / Board of Adjustment · April 16, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Commissioners reviewed proposals to redefine 'building facade' and adjust frontage allocations for signage, discussed complex parcel/parcelized storefronts (the Lewis building) and nonconforming signs, and voted to table a variance until May 7 while staff analyzes sign sizes and ordinance tweaks.

Planning staff presented proposed sign‑code edits that would add a new definition of "building facade" and adjust how frontage is calculated for sign square footage. Commissioners discussed whether the change would resolve issues for a church and for an existing multi‑parcel storefront (referred to as the Lewis building), where parcel divisions and joined walls complicate sign allowances.

Staff noted the revisions were highlighted in blue in the packet and that if the commission wanted the edits to be noticed for public hearing, they could be scheduled for May 7. Commissioners questioned whether the edits would accomplish the church’s request and whether the variance before the Board of Adjustment should be decided before or after code changes.

Members ran through frontage math and flagged that parts of the Lewis frontage add up to figures such as 346.6 ft total and an east‑facing frontage of 237 ft — which would exceed a 200‑square‑foot standard depending on how frontage is counted. Commissioners suggested staff verify whether the existing regulations could already accommodate a 34‑sq‑ft church sign or whether changes are needed. Several members said the variance would be hard to justify without a demonstrated hardship.

The commission moved to adjourn Planning & Zoning and convene the Board of Adjustment. The Board opened, discussed the variance application and moved to table the variance until May 7 so applicants could be present and staff could return with analysis; the BOA motion carried and the meeting closed.