Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Virtual Learning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Kennedale ISD weighs Open Ed virtual partnership, trustees raise testing and special‑education questions
Summary
Board members discussed a proposed Open Ed partnership to offer K–8 virtual instruction to families seeking flexibility; staff said the vendor covers TEKS and uses regional testing centers, but trustees pressed concerns about STAAR testing, special‑education fits, and contract exit terms. Estimated initial enrollment: 100–200 K–8 students.
Kennedale ISD trustees spent an extended portion of their meeting reviewing a potential partnership with Open Ed, a virtual‑learning vendor that markets flexible homeschool‑style packages to families seeking asynchronous or customizable instruction.
District staff said they have met multiple times with Open Ed staff, including legal and instructional teams, and plan further legal review. The vendor’s model was described as different from KISD’s current OnRamps or concurrent‑enrollment offerings: rather than a course‑by‑course one‑to‑one swap, families choose a core instructional package and pick supplementary digital resources (examples given included Dreambox and Lexia) from a vendor portal. Staff emphasized that the vendor’s materials can be configured to cover 100% of TEKS, and that Open Ed would set up regional testing centers for proctored STAAR testing rather than relying on KISD facilities.
Accountability and fit: staff repeatedly told the board that any student enrolled in a publicly funded virtual program must still meet state testing requirements. “They have to take the STAAR,” one district staffer said, adding that families who decline state testing would not be a good fit for the program. Trustees pressed how vendor‑based progress monitoring aligns with local MAP/Growth practices, how special‑education services would be delivered, and whether the district would be able to deny enrollment to students it could not serve. Administrators said these matters would be handled case‑by‑case and would follow the district’s transfer and special‑services policies.
Revenue and scale: administrators presented Open Ed as one path to recapture students and revenue that have left the district for alternative programs. The vendor estimated 100–200 students in year one for K–8 across three campuses (James A. Arthur, Patterson and Kennedale Junior High), a distribution intended to avoid campus‑level virtual designations that would trigger additional state requirements. Trustees discussed contract terms, the ability to stop enrollment or opt out of the agreement mid‑year, and legal review before final approval.
Next steps and risk mitigation: staff said they will continue legal negotiations, refine enrollment controls, and prepare a formal contract and proposal for board consideration. Several trustees expressed cautious interest but requested clear contractual protections on testing, reporting, special‑education compliance and the district’s ability to limit or terminate participation if outcomes or compliance are unsatisfactory.
