Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Banner Program topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission backs youth‑sports banner pilot but narrows sites and tightens rules
Summary
The commission voted unanimously to continue a one‑year youth‑sports banner pilot with stricter application requirements, fewer approved park sites and stronger enforcement after staff described pre‑approval installations and a resident complaint.
Get email alerts on the Banner Program topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The San Clemente Parks & Recreation Commission voted unanimously to continue a one‑year pilot program allowing youth sports groups with city agreements to display sponsorship banners in parks, but it directed staff to limit approved sites and strengthen application and enforcement rules.
Julia, the recreation supervisor who manages sport partners, told commissioners the pilot permitted only partner groups with city agreements to post banners and set design, size and timing rules. She said organizations were required to submit banners for approval two weeks before a season and to remove banners at season’s end, but staff discovered several instances where banners were installed before approval and at least one banner did not meet the logo and sizing rules.
"Both organizations met the application requirements," Julia said, but she added that some groups posted banners early and that longer periods of display led to disrepair and greater staff time for monitoring.
The public also weighed in. Amanda Quintonia, speaking during public comment, said the Little League had installed banners before formal approval but that the banners met size specifications; she relayed a nearby resident’s concern that neighbors were not notified when banners went up at a neighborhood park.
Commissioner Garcia moved to continue the program with modifications: restrict the number of approved park sites (the staff recommendation suggested one primary site per organization), tighten application requirements and add stronger enforcement and a community‑impact evaluation to be returned after the 2025–26 season. Commissioner Hoskins seconded the motion, which passed unanimously.
The commission’s action keeps the program active while asking staff to bring back a refined policy that reduces staff enforcement burdens and improves aesthetic consistency across park sites. Final administrative implementation—such as designated parks and enforcement processes—will be carried out by city staff consistent with the commission’s direction.

