Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Water Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council hears regional water-transfer update as members question selling contract rights

San Marcos City Council · April 14, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Councilmembers summarized San Diego County Water Authority approvals of two 21-year water-transfer contracts that move 10,000 acre-feet annually each; some members expressed frustration that contract sales have coincided with local landscaping restrictions.

At the April 14 meeting Councilmember Leblang summarized a recent League of California Cities session and a presentation by Dan Denham of the San Diego County Water Authority. Leblang said the authority approved two 21-year transfers with Riverside agencies that would move 10,000 acre-feet annually and generate revenue by leveraging existing infrastructure without new construction.

Several councilmembers reacted to the apparent contradiction between selling contract rights and local conservation mandates. One councilmember noted state landscaping restrictions that have limited residential lawns and questioned the logic of selling contract rights while local residents remain subject to watering limits. Councilmembers discussed the complexity of water contracts and noted that some transfers include rights tied to Colorado River supplies, which the federal government is currently reviewing.

Why it matters: Long-term transfers and contract sales can affect regional water reliability and revenue; local officials want clarity about the trade-offs between generating revenue and preserving local supply and landscaping practices.

What’s next: Councilmembers said they would continue to follow SANDAG and Water Authority updates and encouraged residents to read related materials; no local policy change was proposed at the April 14 meeting.