Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Conservation District topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Conservation district outlines farmer aid, equipment rentals and pollinator plots
Summary
Keith Tingle of the Scott County conservation district told the Fiscal Court the district operates on roughly $100,000 annually, helps cover reseeding and cover-crop costs at 50%, pays most dead-animal disposal costs, and now offers rentable equipment such as a manure spreader and chain harrow; the district is expanding outreach including a pollinator-plot program.
Get email alerts on the Conservation District topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Keith Tingle, representing the Scott County conservation district, briefed the Fiscal Court on local conservation activities and funding.
Tingle said conservation districts in Kentucky often operate largely as pass-through entities for farmers and residents and that "100,000 of it is all we need to operate on, really." He described several programs funded or subsidized by the district: cover-crop and pasture reseeding cost-share (the district covers 50% up to program limits), support for school garden projects with funds earmarked for raised beds, and a pollinator-plot program intended to assist local pollination efforts.
Tingle also outlined operational costs returned to farmers and residents, including dead-animal removal, which he said can cost about $185 per animal while the district typically collects $15 from a farmer and absorbs the remainder; he noted some months had payouts near $3,000 because of severe winter losses. The district has begun acquiring rentable conservation equipment — a manure spreader and a folding chain harrow — stored at county facilities and made available to producers for a usage fee that offsets wear-and-tear.
Tingle said the district is increasing outreach and public education, including promoting its pollinator-plot program at local events such as the Festival of the Horse, and encouraged county support and continued funding.
No formal action was taken on the report; court members thanked Tingle and asked staff to record the presentation in meeting minutes.

