Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rates And Facilities topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee weighs rate options and hears resident concerns about $100,000 ball-dispenser estimate
Summary
Committee reviewed competitor rate comparisons, discussed twilight-start timing and possible dynamic pricing for public play; residents questioned a $100,000 capital estimate to move ball-dispensing machines, and the item remains in the capital budget for further discussion.
Get email alerts on the Rates And Facilities topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff presented a competitive analysis of public and membership rates at nearby courses and discussed options for next year’s public rates, twilight start times, and the potential for dynamic pricing targeted at public (nonresident) play. The review showed wide variation in annual unlimited memberships among peer courses and noted some operators use dynamic pricing and cart-included formats to manage demand. Staff said small changes to public green fees (for example, crossing an $80 threshold) would be chiefly perceptual and that a $2–$3 change was not expected to materially damage play.
Committee members asked whether moving twilight start times by half an hour could increase revenue; staff cautioned twilight is structured by daylight and later start times could prevent full 18-hole play during some months. Staff also reported work on a point-of-sale upgrade that could enable dynamic pricing for public rounds while protecting resident rates and said dynamic pricing is “in the works” and possibly feasible for next year depending on implementation.
During public comment resident Dave Dit questioned a $100,000 estimate to move ball-dispensing machines, asking what drives that cost. Staff said earlier cost estimates produced the figure and that the item has been placed in the capital budget but remains open for board discussion. One committee member said they were leaning to remove the item from the capital plan when the board votes; no formal decision was made. Staff also noted moving dispensers to driving ranges could create gathering places but cautioned that could re-create the original nuisance the move seeks to solve.
Another resident, Chris Waller, asked about progress on dynamic pricing; staff said they are evaluating the point-of-sale technology, intend to protect resident rates, and hope to have a clearer timetable later in the year.
No formal motions or votes were recorded on rate changes, dynamic pricing implementation or the ball-dispenser capital estimate during this meeting.

