Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the International Relations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House committee advances six international and sister‑state resolutions
Summary
A House committee on April 17 advanced six Senate concurrent resolutions establishing or recognizing sister‑state and international partnerships, citing educational, cultural and biosecurity cooperation; the committee passed each measure to move forward to the next legislative steps, with some members excused from the vote.
A House committee advanced six Senate concurrent resolutions on April 17 aimed at formalizing or recognizing international and sister‑state relationships, with agency and foreign representatives urging continued exchanges in education, culture and biosecurity.
Committee Chair Illagan opened the morning hearing and read multiple pieces of testimony in support of the measures, including statements from Dennis Ling of the Department of Business, Economic Development and Tourism (DBED) and Jerry Chang, director general of the Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in Honolulu. DBED told the committee it supports several resolutions and noted existing exchange programs — for example, culinary and transportation collaborations with foreign jurisdictions — as a basis for the measures.
The committee’s decision session recorded that Chair Illagan recommended passage of each resolution 'as is' and that the measures were adopted by voice vote or unanimous recorded support among members present. The committee advanced SCR 184, SCR 169 SD1, SCR 47, SCR 57 SD1, SCR 170 SD1 and SCR 163 SD1 to the next legislative step.
Why it matters: The resolutions are largely ceremonial or relationship‑building but have practical implications for agency cooperation, student and cultural exchanges and shared work on issues such as biosecurity. DBED and agency presenters told lawmakers these formal recognitions can open channels that allow state agencies, nonprofits and private partners to pursue joint projects.
What speakers said Dennis Ling, representing DBED, said, 'DBED stands in support of this measure,' and described existing exchanges with foreign prefectures and jurisdictions, including education and transportation collaborations. When asked about sister‑state relationships in Japan, Ling replied that Hawaii has six such relationships and that the measure would add another partnership.
Jerry Chang, director general of the Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in Honolulu, testified in support of SCR 57 SD1 and said, 'This year marks the 33rd anniversary of the... sister state relationship,' and praised longstanding cooperation in education, culture, the economy and disaster management.
A department representative raised a procedural substantive concern about SCR 57 SD1, saying portions of the text that address double taxation 'do not relate to the sister state relationship' and asking to follow up with formal comments; the committee accepted that clarification and did not adopt a technical amendment in order to reduce the risk of the measure being sent to conference with the Senate.
Votes at a glance - SCR 184 — Recommendation: pass as is; committee recorded the chair’s recommendation adopted; recorded present affirmative votes and at least two members excused from the remainder of the hearing (transcript shows Representatives Tam and Gideon excused). - SCR 169 SD1 — Recommendation: pass as is; adopted by voice vote ('With all remaining votes voting I'). - SCR 47 — Recommendation: pass as is; adopted by voice vote. - SCR 57 SD1 — Recommendation: pass as is; committee declined a technical amendment over concern that the Senate could disagree and send the measure to conference; adopted as is. - SCR 170 SD1 — Recommendation: pass as is; adopted by voice vote. - SCR 163 SD1 — Recommendation: pass as is; adopted by voice vote.
Background and next steps: Testimony emphasized educational and cultural exchanges, biosecurity cooperation (notably with Aotearoa/New Zealand), and diplomatic relations; agencies said formal legislative recognition often precedes memoranda of understanding or more specific project‑level agreements. Where agencies requested follow‑up (for example, clarification on taxation language in SCR 57 SD1), the committee indicated written testimony would be accepted after the hearing and that staff and the governor’s office should continue to coordinate. The measures will proceed to the next legislative stages indicated for concurrent resolutions.
The committee adjourned at the close of the session.
