Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Agricultural Tourism topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Public commenter urges guardrails before adding residential zones to Tehama County agricultural‑tourism rules

Tehama County Planning Commission · April 16, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Andrew Grady told the Planning Commission the Agricultural Tourism Amendment should proceed in two steps: approve prepared‑food sales for AG1–AG4 now, but revisit the proposed inclusion of R1A residential zones to add protections (noise, traffic, camping) before adoption.

Andrew Grady, a member of the public, urged the Tehama County Planning Commission on April 16 to separate two parts of a pending Agricultural Tourism Amendment.

Grady said he supports allowing the sale of prepared foods in AG1–AG4 agricultural zones, calling that change “fantastic,” but raised concerns about extending the amendment to R1A residential zones. He said the R1A designation’s primary purpose is to preserve residential uses and that the current draft of the amendment would allow the same uses in R1A as in commercial agricultural zones — including food trucks, higher traffic and “glamping” (Hipcamp‑style short‑term camping) — without “guardrails” to protect neighbors.

The commenter told the commission he had discussed the proposal with county staff and that some code language appears incompatible with residential zoning. He recommended the board approve the prepared‑foods portion for the AG1–AG4 zones and return later with a second amendment that would add guardrails and separate permitted uses for R1A residences.

The recommendation reflects local concerns about noise and traffic in residential neighborhoods that border agricultural uses. Grady said he had already seen neighborhood complaints related to a nearby farmers market and described a hypothetical neighbor who wants to operate short‑term glamping under an agricultural‑tourism claim by selling at least $1,000 in farm products.

No action was taken during public comment; the commission proceeded with its published agenda.