Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Control topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident urges stronger animal-control response after repeated property damage
Summary
During public comment a Montgomery County resident described repeated property damage by neighborhood dogs and roaming cats at a county park, told the court they had called the sheriff "five, six times," and asked the county to consider cameras, stronger enforcement, foster/adoption outreach and other responses; county staff said animal-control officer Adam and sheriff will follow up.
A Montgomery County resident used the public‑comment period at the Sept. 16 fiscal court meeting to press the court for more robust animal‑control responses after repeated incidents of property damage.
What the resident said: The resident described ongoing problems with cats at a county park and dogs from a neighboring property entering their yard and damaging property. They said they had contacted the sheriff’s department “five, six times” and characterized those calls as ineffective, stating, “I think it’s a waste of their time.” The resident said they have videos documenting damage to their property but not footage of animals actually causing the damage.
County response and next steps: The presiding official acknowledged the concern, noted the presence of an animal‑control officer (Adam) and said the county would follow up with Mr. Kracraft and the sheriff to seek a reasonable solution. The official exchanged phone numbers with the resident and said staff would be in touch.
Other suggestions: The resident proposed additional cameras at the park, recruitment of foster homes, and outreach to reduce shelter populations. County staff accepted the offer to help and said they would coordinate follow-up with animal‑control and sheriff’s personnel.
Ending: The court did not take formal action at the meeting beyond promising follow-up; staff will coordinate with animal control and the sheriff on next steps.
