Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Police Accountability topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Judiciary Committee approves amendment to set protocol for officer‑involved shooting investigations
Summary
The committee approved draft 2.1 of H171, adding intent language directing timelier, independent investigations of officer‑involved shootings and asking agencies to evaluate barriers to prompt charging decisions; Attorney General and prosecutors signaled support.
The House Judiciary Committee voted March 13 to report H171 with amendment draft 2.1, which adds intent language and directs a review of investigative and prosecutorial processes in officer‑involved shootings.
Legislative counsel introduced a new subsection stating that the General Assembly finds it is in the public interest to efficiently and thoroughly conduct independent investigations of officer‑involved shootings (OIS) and to facilitate cooperation among entities responsible for those investigations to bolster public trust. Todd Davis of the Attorney General's office said the office supports the amendment; he and Kim McManis of the Department of State’s Attorneys and Sheriffs offered to participate in producing a report to the Legislature in December.
The Department of Public Safety provided written testimony (Tucker Jones) emphasizing that timeliness of criminal charging decisions in officer‑involved shootings is a primary policy concern. Committee members said the amendment seeks to identify barriers to timely charging determinations and to improve protocols that affect both public confidence and fairness to officers under review.
Why it matters: The amendment aims to speed and standardize the handling of OIS investigations and prosecutorial review, addressing long timelines that stakeholders said undermine public confidence.
What’s next: The committee reported H171; staff will circulate a clean version and interested agencies will take part in crafting the report and follow-up work.
