Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Arcades topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission recommends tighter rules for arcades and skill games
Summary
Planning staff proposed Ordinance 2601 to reclassify arcades (more than four devices) as a conditional primary use in the Commercial Retail district with 1,000-foot buffers from schools and similar locations, restricted hours and a permitting requirement; the commission voted to recommend a council public hearing.
Planning staff presented Ordinance 2601 on April 14, proposing stricter zoning for amusement devices and arcades to prevent clustering and reduce nuisance activity. The draft ordinance would treat fewer than four skill machines as an accessory use but make any establishment with more than four devices a primary use allowed only by conditional use in the Commercial Retail (CR) district.
The proposal would require a 1,000-foot separation, measured property line to property line, from sensitive uses such as schools, daycare centers, parks and religious institutions, and a 1,000-foot separation between arcades to discourage clustering. Staff said proposed operating limits would effectively restrict hours to between 11 p.m. and 10 a.m. and would require operators to obtain a permit so the municipality can track compliance.
"We're seeing more and more establishments add over four devices ... and even if they come in with one or two to start, it'll snowball into more later on," the planning staff member told the commission, explaining the rationale for reclassifying heavily equipped venues as conditional uses.
Commissioners pressed staff on enforcement and whether existing businesses would be grandfathered. Staff said fines would be the first enforcement step and repeat or serious violations could be referred to district court. Police and zoning enforcement will coordinate compliance checks, and the permitting system is intended to record current device counts and identify repeat violators.
The commission moved, seconded and voted to recommend Ordinance 2601 for a council public hearing next week. The recommendation was forwarded by roll call/voice vote.
