Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Lodging Tax topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County reviews lodging-tax grants and asks whether board wants more visibility on awards
Summary
County staff described three lodging-tax funding buckets — an annual $50,000 marketing grant, a $200,000 infrastructure grant awarded every two years (with a $100,000 placeholder in off years), and earmarks for visitor centers — and asked whether the board wants to see all awards or only the larger grants.
Get email alerts on the Lodging Tax topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A county director (recorded in the transcript as Kim) walked commissioners through the lodging-tax program and the advisory-committee process required by state law. She said the lodging tax is statutorily designated to promote tourism and overnight stays, and that awards are reviewed and scored by the advisory committee before contracts are executed.
Kim described three funding pools: an annual marketing grant (typically $50,000) intended to help events with promotion; a larger infrastructure grant awarded every two years that provides $200,000 in the award year with a $100,000 placeholder on the off year; and recurring support for local visitor centers (e.g., Woodland, Kelso/Long Beach, and Castle Rock/Cassok as named in the materials). She said applicants include community groups such as the North County Recreation Association, which has applied for infrastructure support to improve park facilities.
Kim asked the board whether it wanted staff to bring all grant awards to the commission for review, or to continue presenting only the larger grants and letting staff execute smaller awards under director authority. Commissioners indicated they were generally comfortable continuing current practice but asked to review larger grants at the next meeting.
What happens next: staff said they will bring the larger pending grants to next week's agenda for the board's signature and continue routine small-grant processing through the advisory committee.

