Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parking Lease topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves amended parking lease with developer after lengthy questions about term, maintenance and space
Summary
Trustees approved a lease allowing a developer to use village street/right‑of‑way for parking with an amendment limiting leased stalls to land the lessee owns; the board debated term length, cancellation rights, maintenance obligations and revenue ($10,000/year with modest annual increases).
The Brown Deer Village Board spent an extended portion of its April 20 meeting discussing and amending a proposed lease that would allow a private developer (referred to as F Street in staff materials) to construct and maintain on‑street parking spaces adjacent to a development in Village 43.
Trustees questioned key business terms including the number and location of spaces (discussion referenced figures from roughly 20 spaces up to as many as 56), who is responsible for maintenance and snow removal, whether the village retains rights to terminate the lease early, and what happens to the roadway and maintenance responsibilities at the end of the lease. Staff said the lease provides for F Street to construct and maintain the parking facility in accordance with an Exhibit B design; the lease lists $10,000 annual rent with a modest annual increase (noted as about $250/year) and extends to the termination of TID 5 with two 10‑year renewal options.
Board members expressed concern about giving leased parking along property the lessee does not own; after discussion the board amended the lease to limit leased parking to the area adjacent to the lessee’s property and approved the lease with that amendment. Trustees also discussed adding clearer termination or performance clauses; staff and the village attorney said causes for termination exist and that specific notice/termination language could be added if the board preferred.
The motion to approve the lease with the amendment was moved by Trustee Owens and seconded by Trustee Greavves; the motion carried.
What it means: The lease shifts construction and ongoing maintenance responsibility to the lessee and will produce modest revenue for the village. Trustees signaled they may request clearer termination language and more explicit maintenance standards in future drafts or during implementation.
