Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the D14 Partial Advance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves conditional partial advance of net proceeds in contested D14 case after beneficiary’s plea
Summary
After beneficiary Evette Masaoka appealed for a $268,690 advancement of proceeds from her surrendered lease, the commission discussed statutory limits and staff prudence and approved a motion to release funds on a good‑faith calculation with a post‑transaction accounting and residual payout to the beneficiary.
At a public meeting of the Hawaiian Homes Commission, beneficiary Evette Masaoka asked commissioners to advance most of the net proceeds from the appraisal of her surrendered lease so she could relocate; she said department staff failed to meet with her and that the department’s proposed withholding would cause a large loss of equity.
"My Curtistown home was appraised for $330,000… I am requesting that 97% of that… be released to me," Masaoka said during public testimony, noting moving costs and an unsafe replacement property.
Homestead Services Division Administrator Juan Garcia outlined the legal framework (Hawaii Administrative Rule 10‑2‑9 and rule 10365), explained past practice on advances and recommended prudence: the department had proposed withholding an amount to cover an outstanding mortgage (disclosed as about $55,000) and potential unknown expenses. Garcia said department practice has sometimes advanced large percentages but that a very high immediate payout can leave the department exposed to maintenance or legal costs if an award to a new lease holder is delayed.
Commissioners questioned the precise breakdown of withheld amounts and the condition of the new house the beneficiary would occupy; several asked staff to quantify the likely uses of withheld funds before final disbursement. The commission approved the department motion with a modification: release a large portion of the proceeds on a good‑faith estimate after deducting overt liabilities and retain a conservative holdback to cover verifiable, unforeseen costs — with the requirement that any residual funds be remitted to the beneficiary after final accounting.
The vote carried after the chair’s amendment to permit flexible additional releases contingent on documented costs.
What this means: The commission balanced the beneficiary’s equity loss claim with the department’s responsibility to preserve proceeds for debts and plausible cleanup or maintenance costs. Commissioners emphasized the need for clearer, itemized accounting from staff and faster communication with beneficiaries in similar cases.
Sources: Public testimony by Evette Masaoka; presentation and Q&A with Homestead Services Division Administrator Juan Garcia; recorded commission action on item D14.
