Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Data Centers topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Lawmakers pass data‑center guardrails after floor debate over ratepayer protections

Tennessee House of Representatives · April 21, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The House approved HB 1847, which sponsors say adds consumer protections around data‑center development but opponents said amendments narrowed the bill, limited coverage to very large facilities and left utilities free to pass infrastructure costs to ratepayers. Debate focused on thresholds, transparency, and local oversight.

Representative Butler carried HB 1847, which he described as a bill that “puts some guardrails around data centers to protect consumers.” Butler said the measure, as amended on the floor, seeks to balance industry investment and consumer safeguards and renewed his motion for passage.

Representative Pearson challenged the changes adopted in committee and on the floor, arguing the bill as amended had strayed from its original intent. Pearson said the bill now applies only to the largest facilities and contains exceptions that allow utilities to bill residents for infrastructure built to serve private data centers. “This amendment makes a general statement about protecting residents, but has several exceptions…allowing local power companies to reimburse data centers for infrastructure cost,” Pearson said, warning the measure could shift costs to constituents and provide insufficient transparency.

Butler responded on the floor that the current amendment sets a 50‑megawatt threshold and that the bill provides safeguards for ratepayers. After extended discussion over thresholds, utility authority and transparency, the House voted to pass HB 1847 as amended.

Next steps: the bill passed third reading in the House and will proceed in the legislative process toward the Senate or, if the Senate language is already conforming, toward enrollment for the governor’s consideration.